Polyor's stance in disruptive. In all candor herein a number of historical LinkedIn posts heaped pêle-mêle ...

Bold & courageous move by Senus Ltd (Ireland). This partnership with Polyor SAS Research will surely help bring about next generation nutrient management plans (NMP) for sustainable agriculture and soil conservation.

Read more  

The Günther et al. 2024 article regarding the European Commission’s carbon removal certification framework (CRCF) merits a readthrough. Quite, maybe too!?, critical of current carbon-farming protocoles, let me quote a few snippets ; ...

Read more  

I rest my case ! See the following article concerning the economics of carbon-farming ; Berta & Roux 2024. "The endless expansion of carbon offsetting: sequestration by agricultural soils in historical perspective" / Cambridge Journal of Economics 2024, 1 of 20

Read more  

Polyor SAS's, tenuous!, on-line participation in CREDIBLE's recent European Carbon-Farming Summit (Valencia, March 05-07). Thanx to Andrea Ferrarini (FG1.2 - Economic Value of SOM) for accommodating my absence at the event. For those interested, herein the pitch's pptx & the accompanying text.

Read more  

Carbon-farming or soil conservation? Soinne et al. 2024 is a reminder that things might be simpler than they look; "Alongside the aim of increasing OC accrual in mineral agricultural soils, we should stress the importance of maintaining [conserving] the current OC stocks".

Read more  

Carbon-farming as a means of soil organic carbon & matter build-up & sequestration are getting a lot airtime recently. This said, the jury seems to be still out, not having reached any consensus at to how or how much GHG can be offset via. For instance some quotes, verbatim ; ...

Read more  

Problems of measurements. Despite its focus on CDR (carbon dioxide removals) in Californian forests, Joseph Wilson’s 2024 article is relevant to the carbon-farming conundrum. Wilson evokes baseline projections, carbon-sequestration, degrees of uncertainty, measurement processes & their costs, subjectivity, alternative approaches, etc.

Read more  

Minasny et al. 2023 - " ... we must shift away from increasing to maintaining SOC stocks and reducing losses. We need to redirect our attention to ongoing soil degradation /…/ our concern should not be the share of GHG emissions offsetted by increased SOC stocks but rather the impact of preventing avoidable losses.”

Read more  

Post-COP debrief. cf. Robert Höglund’s report from COP28; “Carbon credits' greatest problems have been their inability to live up to offset claims /.../. Even if some of the credits were creating impact, it is too hard to prove that a ton was truly avoided or removed by purchase of a credit. /…/ companies should use credits to claim they contribute to climate action.

Read more  

llustrating AgroNum™. As a follow-up to a recent Polyor SAS post, herein another example of how & when AgroNum™ N-fertilizer response curves (CRP) sit well with those obtained from certain European long-term experiments (LTE). This specific LTE is situated at Rothamsted, Harpenden UK,

Read more  

VALIDATION. Long-term experiments (LTE) are often good illustrations of sustainability. Often, the RDN grain-nitrogen yield response to TUN N-fertilization on such LTEs is analogous to AgroNum™ N-fertilizer response curves. Herein, data from Knapp et al. 2023 for winter-wheat over 30 site-years.

Read more  

AgroNum™ validation as a means to soil organic carbon & nitrogen conservation. 200 field-plots whose cropping practices (CP) were modified to increase grain yields in accordance with Polyor SAS’s AgroNum™ N-fertilizer response curves were modelled using an R version of the well-known soil organic carbon model, RothC.

Read more